The oncological journey

There are many different hypotheses that all claim evidence for the mechanisms behind carcinogenesis (the formation of cancer cells) and all have accompanying dogmas, protocols, anecdotes, clinical experiences, and various associations on which the hypotheses are based. My relationship with what I learn is pretty stochastic and random. For me, it does not matter which definition or system things fit into. As long as one does not belong to an ideology, one does not need to change an algorithmic system when one receives information that contradicts something one already knows. Multiluteral metaformatics is about continuously including information, based on the concept 1 + 1 = 1, where one (1) can only be described and defined by the infinite perspectives that surround one (1). This means that any new understanding can only lead to the enrichment of the perception rather than a contradiction. The foundation of this type of understanding of reality is all forms of logic, the relations betw

  The simple answer is that "I have no idea" and "I have not" as multiluteral metaformatics is based on in situ understanding of everything. This is a scientific approach to understanding based on the concept 1 + 1 = 1. To explain it in more detail, one must understand a number as a picture of a collection of associations rather than something definitive. When one thereby creates a synthetic situation one is to research, for example, to cultivate a cell culture in a petri dish, then it is the synthetic situation in situ one is actually studying. That one studies something in vitro is really an abstract construction, an illusion, created by the neocortex, the layer in our brain that makes it possible to judge. I want to study and research how my body responds to actual conditions in a natural environment and my body lives mostly in relation to rooms other than the laboratory. Therefore, I use performance markers rather than biomarkers I can only measure via invasive

  My journey to cancer research and eating only meat is quite enjoyable. I consider my life privileged as I have largely escaped a number of formal indoctrinations and life restrictions most people think are necessary as a result of what to me seems like a combination of several factors; a fantastic desire for knowledge and research, growing up in a forest where I could discover and play, a very intelligent and musical mother with low self-esteem who gave me both intellectual stimuli and room to develop my own reasoning, an empathetic state (morbid empathy), strangely screwed together brain, immune system, a quantity and variety in experiences that few people are fortunate enough to have and an attitude to life that has made it possible to find joys in sorrows as well as progress in uphills. The ability to see things from multiple perspectives is probably the backbone of my overall happiness and what makes me look at myself as the luckiest person I have met. The ability to disregard on

Yo! I call myself Pål. I have grown and reduced tumors in my own body over a long period of time, supposedly over 10 years. When I received my diagnosis, my research urge was stronger than my fears, which led me to the discovery of the so-called carnivore diet where one repairs various metabolic conditions by removing plant materials from the diet, which has brought great and many benefits in terms of health and quality of life for my part. Here I will take you on my journey through the jungle of perspectives, research methods and results, adversities, and the respective settings I use to deal with them. Although I have been using nutritional intervention to both reduce and grow tumors for over 10 years, it is really only now that the experiment begins as one of the several hypotheses that deals with oncogenesis, not least tumorigenesis, is that it is genetic changes that lead to tumor growth, which indicates that it will be an evolutionary advantage for the tumor to accumulate genetic